Gigs, dance, art

February 17th, 2010: Hofesh Shechter – Uprising / In your rooms

@théatre de la ville

Seeing for the first time work from a choreographer I had never heard of but really like is a great feeling. Hofesh Shechter brought that to me, and I hope he’ll become a regular over here. Especially because even with this small sample size, there were already hints that he’s building something. In your rooms quoted movements from the slightly earlier Uprising, and in a way that made clear it was intentional. There might have been a little too much post-modern distance, but it was nicely rendered harmless by the physical engagement and the drumming. Not exactly a promising choreographer, he’s already delivering on those promises.

Uprising started a little too close to expectations with its aggressive interactions, but that went away in a hurry. There were a few striking individual moments, like the guy running with his arms outstretched but bent a little — that was used again in the other piece — but what I liked best were the group dynamics. Groups would form, split or meld seamlessly for most of the show, but each dancer kept a separate identity and that made the groups morph along. The way dancers crossed the stage, often in a sliding crouch, gave a sense of getting a glimpse of a bigger world, and doing that with such simple tools impressed me a lot. Another favorite moment involved shoulder movements on a lighted line in front of the stage.

The lighting was really good in the first piece, but it was even better in In your rooms, a crucial part indeed, and Lee Curran deserves a shout out. The light brought groups in and out of view, again giving a sense of snapshots of something wider going on, because they were already in motion and didn’t stop before disappearing. At first there was a screen in front that enhanced the effect, but it did work just as well without it. That feeling was made possible by the dance itself, which used a lot of repetitive back-and-forth elements, or longer term cycles, in both cases it was easy to imagine this going on both before and after. At times the whole stage would come into view, usually for bigger groups that also displayed Shechter’s mastery of those. All those dancers would only rarely be doing the same thing, and most of that seemed to be setting up the subgroups splitting into variants, with a fluid membership that didn’t break the rhythms at all, adding another dimension to it as the overall distribution of movement evolved. In contrast to the first piece, the dancers were much more interchangeable parts here, but that didn’t hurt because it was consistent with the off-on-off lighting. The individuality did come through, but over the long run, in a subdued way. Maybe as proof that there was no set boundary, there was also a full lights on part with a dancer drawing a line across the stage, then others stepping on the stage then retreating. Still that off-on-off thing though.

There’s so much more to these, and I already wish I could see In your rooms again because I’m sure I missed a lot. This one feels like a statement to me, and maybe I can look forward to him revisiting it in the future. In the meantime, I’m eager to see more of his work, hopefully next year.


February 27, 2010 - Posted by | Dance | ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s